Noise Resilience in Dermoscopic Image Segmentation: Comparing Deep Learning Architectures for Enhanced Accuracy

Ergin F., PARLAK İ. B., Adel M., Gül Ö. M., Karpouzis K.

Electronics (Switzerland), cilt.13, sa.17, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 13 Sayı: 17
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.3390/electronics13173414
  • Dergi Adı: Electronics (Switzerland)
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Aerospace Database, Communication Abstracts, INSPEC, Metadex, Directory of Open Access Journals, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: artificial intelligence, deep learning, image processing, machine learning, neural networks
  • Galatasaray Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Skin diseases and lesions can be ambiguous to recognize due to the similarity of lesions and enhanced imaging features. In this study, we compared three cutting-edge deep learning frameworks for dermoscopic segmentation: U-Net, SegAN, and MultiResUNet. We used a dermoscopic dataset including detailed lesion annotations with segmentation masks to help train and evaluate models on the precise localization of melanomas. SegAN is a special type of Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) that introduces a new architecture by adding generator and discriminator steps. U-Net has become a common strategy in segmentation to encode and decode image features for limited data. MultiResUNet is a U-Net-based architecture that overcomes the insufficient data problem in medical imaging by extracting contextual details. We trained the three frameworks on colored images after preprocessing. We added incremental Gaussian noise to measure the robustness of segmentation performance. We evaluated the frameworks using the following parameters: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Dice and Jaccard coefficients. Our accuracy results show that SegAN (92%) and MultiResUNet (92%) both outperform U-Net (86%), which is a well-known segmentation framework for skin lesion analysis. MultiResUNet sensitivity (96%) outperforms the methods in the challenge leaderboard. These results suggest that SegAN and MultiResUNet are more resistant techniques against noise in dermoscopic segmentation.