Challenges of “economic reconstruction” in Syria after the Assad regime


Çiftçi A.

Historical Materialism Istanbul: From Catastrophe to Struggle: Rethinking Capitalism amid Wars and Disasters, İstanbul, Türkiye, 3 - 05 Nisan 2026, (Yayınlanmadı)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Yayınlanmadı
  • Basıldığı Şehir: İstanbul
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • Galatasaray Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The Assad regime’s violent suppression of the 2011 Syrian popular revolt produced not only a massive humanitarian catastrophe but also a profound economic collapse. After roughly fourteen years of revolutionary upheaval and civil war and the fall of a fifty-four-year political dynasty, a provisional government was formed under the leadership of Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham, which had been controlling the Idlib region. One of the central issues of this “transition period” has been how to carry out “economic reconstruction.”

This paper begins by examining Syria’s economic conditions in the final years of the Assad regime and then analyzes the economic and social policies pursued by the provisional government after taking power. It focuses on the tensions and contradictions between these policies and the urgent needs and demands of the poor and popular sectors of society. What are the core elements of the provisional government’s economic strategy? What are the fundamental economic and social needs of Syria’s working classes and popular sectors? What kinds of antagonisms have emerged between government policy and popular needs, and what types of social and political developments might these conflicts trigger in the near future?

Drawing on field observations from visits to several Syrian cities after the fall of the regime, interviews with both younger and older generations of left, labor and human right activists, and systematic news monitoring, this study argues that the provisional government’s current economic policies risk shifting Syria from its previous status as a semi-colony of Russia and Iran toward a new dependence on Western imperialist powers and Gulf states. It contends that these dynamics may ignite new waves of mass mobilization driven by economic and social grievances.